-61-
28) Continuing on in
this same play (Hamlet) we’ll go back
a few pages and see that there are pages for 276, 277, 278, and then when the
next page would be 279, we instead are faced with the mispagination of 259,
the Kay value for “Shakespeare”. So there are three mispaginations in a row
(157, 259, and 282) that are significant numbers associated with Francis Bacon,
two of them seeming to represent either a symbolic name or a pseudonym.
There are a
lot more mispaginations than these and most of them I haven’t connected to
anything related to Bacon. Nor have I tried much since my focus is primarily on
significant signature numerals. Here’s my list. The Red-Bold numbers are
mispaginations. Those that are underlined are Bacon significant numbers. Some play
names are present to give a sense of location in the First Folio. These can be
reviewed on the following website using the “Pages” drop down box.
Comedies
Merry
Wives of Windsor
[1-48, 49, 58, 51, 52, 53, …58, 51,
60, …]
[85, 88, 87, 88,
] The Comedie of Errors
A
Midsommer nights Dreame
[159, 160, 163,
162, 163, 162, 163, 166,] (Merchant of Venice)
As you
like it [186, 187,
188, 187,
190, 191, 192, …]
All’s Well that Ends Well [248, 251, 252,
251, 252…, 264, 273,
266…303]
Histories
[1-46, 49 (no page 47 or 48) ] Henry the Fourth part 1 (52 is actually 50, 54 is actually 52, 55 is actually 53)
50-88, 91, 92, 91, 92-100 2nd part Henry
the fourth [page 89 is missing, and no page 90 just
as there is no Page 90 in the 1640 Advancement
of Learning]
After page
100 there are two unnumbered pages.
Then page 69
for Henry the Fifth thru to 232, then two unnumbered.
Tragedies
Troilus
and Cressida began
with the second of the above mentioned unnumbered page.
Then pages
79,80, and then 26 unnumbered pages through the end of the play.
Then with Coriolanus
we have pages 1-76. [then no page 77 or 78]
Then 79, 80, 81, 82 [actually 77, 78, 79, 80]. Then
81-98, then two unnumbered.
Then 109-156, Hamlet
then 257 [actually
157]-278, then 259 [actually 279], 280,
281, 280 [actually
282],
then 283-307, then 38, then 309-378, then 389 [actually 379] (Recall that this
pg 389 was where the geometrical ‘Rosiecross’ name cipher was found). then
380-398, then 993.
The missing
pages of 47, and 48 in the Histories enabled the correspondences between pages
50, 52, 53, and 55 discussed earlier.
Interestingly, on page 199 of the Comedies in As You Like It we read “…the oath of Lover is no stronger than the
word of a Tapster, they are both the confirmer of false reckonings”.
There is a declared cipher on page 264 of the Comedies where Malvolio
ponders the hidden meaning of M.O.A.I. I
haven’t found a meaningful solution but page 264 in The Advancement is all about ciphers.
There may be
some slight variation in mispaginations among the extant copies of the First
Folio but I can’t imagine that any would change the above important findings.
To give these page number cipher candidates a better test would require a
closer examination of them in the various extant First Folios. But then any
studies may also need to determine their order of printing and as well be done
by unbiased researchers.
No comments:
Post a Comment