Showing posts with label Romeo-Juliet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romeo-Juliet. Show all posts

Sunday, June 5, 2011

THE MEDICINE IN SHAKESPEARE

Perhaps serious consideration should be given as to whether or not William Shakspere of Stratford should be credited with the discovery of the circulation of the blood, rather than William Harvey. One medical practitioner ponders this question.

THE MEDICINE IN SHAKESPEARE

BY ORVILLE W. OWEN, M. D.,
_________

Extracts from a lecture at a stated meeting of the Detroit Medical and Library Association.

I wish to open up a comparatively new question--the circulation of the blood as found in the plays. With it I shall give you a little anatomical knowledge from the plays, for the author must have either dissected the human body or at least seen it done, and that he was perfectly familiar with the experiments and proofs of the circulation I think I can show to your satisfaction. For we find it scattered through all the thirty-six plays contained in this volume, and in so plain and elaborate a manner that I cannot believe but that I can show you he was either the original discoverer of the great anatomical and physiological truth or knew intimately the experiments and dissections upon which it is based.

Here I make an extraordinary statement which is, if William Shakespeare wrote the plays bearing his name, he discovered the circulation of the blood instead of Dr. William Harvey. And further, if Shakespeare wrote the plays, Harvey stole the discovery from Shakespeare. One of these statements must be correct if it is allowed for an instant that William Shakespeare wrote the plays, and I will now proceed to prove my statement. I must preface it with a short epitome of both Harvey and Shakespeare.

Dr. Harvey took his literary degree at Caius College, Cambridge, and his medical degree at the great school of medicine at Padua. He returned to London and was, in the year 1615, appointed Lumlian professor at Bartholomew Hospital. In the year 1616, about the latter part, he made his first discovery of the circulation, but did not make it public until the year 1619, when he published his first little monograph upon the subject, but it was not until the year 1628 that he became fully sure the world was ready for the announcement. In that year he published the work which makes him famous at the present day.

Master William Shakespeare finished writing, so his biographers tell us, in the year 1612, and although the works bearing his name were not published until 1623, and although they were double in amount, all of them having been rewritten, still, the gentlemen referred to say he did nothing after 1612. Master William, having finished his work, thought it best to depart from this vale of tears, and did so in April, 1616. Notice the last of his writing, done in 1612, and his death occurring in the April before Harvey makes his discovery.

If there is one word in the plays of the circulation, then there is a great discrepancy between Shakespeare and Harvey. For if Harvey did make it Shakespeare must have risen from his grave to write it in the 1623 edition. If, on the other hand, Shakespeare wrote it before his death, then Harvey must have stolen it. The first thought that arises is, get the early editions of the plays and see if it was in them. But here steps in a difficulty which we cannot overcome, namely, six of the plays never appeared except in the 1623 edition, and all the others are completely rewritten and enlarged to about double their original size. For instance, Richard Third’s whole opening speech, commencing "Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York" is not found in any of the early editions of the plays. So of them all, they are so changed from the first printed copies that there is no use in citing them in any way, so that we are forced to abide by the 1623 edition and no other. This being the case, and as the 1623 is the only edition having all the so-called Shakespeare plays, we will use that as the basis of comparison.

Examine these quotations:

Coriolanus 1.1.126-139
"Your most grave belly was deliberate,
Not rash like his accusers and thus answered:
True is it, my incorporate friend, quoth he,
That I receive the general food at first
Which do you live upon; and fit it is;
Because I am the store-house and the shop
Of the whole body: but if you do remember,
I send it through the rivers of your blood,
Even to the court the heart--to th’ seat o’ th’ braine;
And, through the cranks and offices of man,
The strongest nerves, and small inferior veines,
From me receive that natural competencie
Whereby they live; and though that all at once,
You, my good friends (this says the belly) mark me."


Now please turn to Romeo and Juliette, 1.1.85 and read:

"With purple fountains issuing from your veins."

Then in this same play at 4.1.93-99:

"Take thou this viole, being then in bed,
And this distilling liquor drink thou of,
When presently through all thy veins shall run
A cold and drowsy humor, for no pulse
Shall keep his native progress but surcease;
No warmth nor breath shall testify thou livest;
The roses in thy lips and cheeks shall fade."


Next turn to Love’s Labour Lost, 4.3.309-12:

"Why, universal plodding poisions up
The nimble spirits in the arteries:
As motion, and long during action, tires
The sinewy vigor of the traveler."

Now drop down the same column at 4.3.332-337 read:

"Lives not alone emured in the brain;
But with the motion of all elements,
Courses as swift as thought in every power;
And gives to every power a double power,
Above their functions and their offices.
It adds a precious seeing to the eye;"


Now see what's in Twelfth Night at 1.1.38-39:

"Liver, brain, and heart,
These sovereign thrones are all supplied and filled."

The same play at 3.2.58-60:

"If he were opened and you find so much blood in his liver
As will clog the foot of a flea, I will eat th’ rest of th’ anatomy."


Now turn to Henry the Sixth, part II, 3.2.160-168:

"See how the blood is settled in his face.
Oft have I seene a timely-parted ghost
Of ashy semblance, meagre, pale, and bloodless
Being all descended to the labouring heart
Who in the conflict that it holds with death
Attracts the same for aidance ’gainst the enemy
Which with the heart there cools and ne’re returneth
To blush and beautifie the cheek againe.
But see his face is blacke and full of blood."

Now read Henry the Fourth, part II, 4.3.108-110:

"The vitall commoners and inland pettie spirits
Muster me all to their capitaine, the heart, who great
And puft up with his retinue, doth any deed of courage."


The Winter’s Tale, 5.3.62-68:

Leontes. "Let be, let be would.
I were dead but that methinks alreadie
(What was he that did make it? See (my Lord)
would you not deeme it breathed and that those veines
Did verily beare blood?"
Polixenes. "Masterly done!
The very life seems warm upon her lip"
Leontes. "The fixture of her eye has motion in it,
As we are mock’d with art."


Finally, in The Merchant of Venice, 4.1.108, we find:

"A messenger with letters from the doctor, new come from Padua."

And just below it 4.1.112, read:

"My flesh, blood, bones and all
Ere thou shalt lose for me one drop of blood."
--------------------------------------------

Was Shakespeare an anatomist? Every portion of the human body known to his day is mentioned. Was he a student of physiology? Physiological functions are given in detail. Had he knowledge of materia medica? He speaks of many medicines. Was he a neurologist? It might be called his specialty, and I must confess I feel hardly competent to analyze his wonderful descriptions and delineations in this great field of our science. All the types of insanity are fully described. The sleep-walking dementia of Lady Macbeth is paralleled by the suicidal insanity of Ophelia. King Lear’s delirium is a good foil to Hamlet’s feigned madness. The tragical jealousy of Othello is a counterfoil to the comical jealousy of Master Ford. Richard the Third, Macbeth, Edmund, Malvolio, the different fools, Gonerill, Timon of Athens, and Titus Andronicus, will show types of either real or feigned madness, or mental instability. How did he give these medical observations to the world three hundred years ago. How did he know it? Where did he find it if not from the study of the insane?

* * *

If we consider that Francis Bacon could be the author of the plays, then our questions are easily answered:

"I have oft seene Dr. William Harvey, the new doctor from Padua, at Bartholomew Hospital, in the presence of the learned doctors, force a purple, distilling liquor through the veines of a dead body, and, after it had descended to the heart, liver, and lungs, the blood-coloured liquor returneth againe to the face which blacke and full of blood, or pale, meagre, and bloodless before, doth blush and beautifie, as if with life; you would think the body breathed; the very lippe is warme to look upon; but we are mock’d with art as there is no pulse gainst the finger and though the arteries seem full, yet no life is present. The legs, waist, arms, hands, brow, and limbs seem alive, but we can never ransome nature. The doctor was enrolled at Caius College."-Francis Bacon
William Harvey was a close friend of Bacon, as well as his private physician.
In addition, Francis Bacon in 1600 wrote to Queen Elizabeth that his mother was "much worn." Shortly afterwards she became violently insane and continued to do so, under the sole care of Francis Bacon, until her death in 1610.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

The Bacon and Shakespeare Theory of Spirits - 5

The Bacon and Shake-Speare Theory of "spirits"

part 5 of 9 

(d)  the concept of vital spirits being seized

First, Shake-Speare:
      
from Romeo and Juliet 4.1.95-97

Quarto 1 says of the drug to be given to Juliet to put her into a sleep which feigns death:

"When presently through all thy veins shall run
A cold and drowsy humour which shall seize
Each and vital spirit".


Bacon in his History of Henry VII says of a pestilent fever:

"It seemeth not seated in the veins or humurs...only a malign vapour flew to the heart and seized the vital spirits; which stirred nature to strive to send it forth by an extreme sweat".

Did other writers speak of something "seizing the vital spirits"?  (The words "which shall seize each vital spirit" are omitted from the later Quartos and from the First Folio).

end of (d)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(e)   inflamed spirits

from Shake-Speare's 2 Henry IV 4.3.92-4

Falstaff:  They are generally fools and cowards - which some of us would be
              too but for inflammation [i.e. excitement through drink].

Comments: In his Novum Organum Bacon says:

"Some opiates, when taken in moderation, do strengthen the spirits, render them more robust and check the useless and inflammatory motion [i.e. some opiates, if taken in moderation, do not excite unduly]".

The O.E.D. gives the Shake-Speare text as the first and only instance of "inflammation", meaning excitement through drink or drugs. But here Bacon uses "inflammatory" in the same sense. Further, in his History of Life and Death also Bacon three times speaks of the inflammation of the spirits, namely:

"And there is no question that the spirits most absorb and consume the body, so that a larger quantity of them or a greater inflammation and acrimony greatly shortens life".

"Next follows the inquiry for restraining the motions of the spirits, for motion evidently alternates and inflames them. This restraint is effected in three ways; namely by sleep, by avoiding strong labour, too much exercise and all fatigue, and by controlling uneasy affections [passions]".

"The vital spirit has in it a degree of inflammation and is like a breath compounded of flame and air".

A little later in the same speech from 2 Henry IV Falstaff links the vital spirits and the heart, as Bacon does in the Henry VII text above. In line 106 Falstaff says that one benefit of drinking sherry is that

"then the vital commoners, and inland petty spirits, muster me all to their captain, the heart; who great and puffed up with this retinue, doth any deed of courage".

Thus Shake-Speare thinks of the natural science doctrine of vital spirits even when giving Falstaff a joke about drinking sherry.

end of (e)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  

(f)  from Othello 23.273-5

"O thou invisible spirit of wine, if thou hast no name to be known by, let us call thee Devil!"

Bacon in his Natural History wrote:

"Drunken men...reel, they tremble, they cannot stand nor speak strongly. The cause is, for that the spirits of the wine oppress the spirits animal and occupate part of the place where they are".

Here, Bacon, and apparently Shake-Speare, extend the theory of spirits to wine; Bacon being one of those, as we have seen who made the extension to inorganic bodies. And why does Shake-Speare call the spirit of wine "invisible"? Possibly in keeping with Bacon's view that the spirits were "altogether intangible and without weight" (to quote Spedding's summary).

end of  (f) and of part 5 of 9

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Promus - 6 - intro to Folio 112

Parallels between Shake-Speare and Bacon's Promus

Parallels between Bacon's Promus and Romeo and Juliet
(with special emphasis on Promus Folio 112) (A folio is a page in the Promus)

Promus Folio 112 represents the 4th subset of parallels that Cockburn felt was remarkable enough, by itself, to constitute proof of common authorship between Bacon and Shake-Speare). We're getting into more advanced analysis here but we'll take just a bit at a time, as we're doing with the Law in Shake-Speare.

Introduction:

Romeo and Juliet was first published in 1597. But this Quarto was pirated and its text corrupt. It was followed in 1599 by a good Quarto. The play is usually thought to have been written in 1595, though some have given it a wider date bracket. Both Q1 and Q2 recite that the play had often been acted by the Lord Chamberlain's Men with no mention of its having been acted by any other company. The Lord Chamberlain's Men, Will Shakspere's company, was not formed till the Spring of 1594. The Arden editor, p. 29, specifies "certain significant reminiscences of The Comedy Of Errors in Romeo and Juliet" and adds that they "may partly be accounted for by the important performance of The Comedy Of Errors at the Gray's Inn Revels on 28 December 1594, when Shakespeare was writing Romeo And Juliet; Errors was fresh in his mind". It was probably in 1595 or December 1594 that Folio 112 of Bacon's Promus was compiled since the immediate previous Folio pages can be dated to that time. So this was about the time, or just before, that Romeo And Juliet was written.

There is a remarkable weight of parallels between this Folio (112) and the play. In the next posting is a transcription by two British Library officials of it, with added 'entry numbers' to the left of each. (The spelling is kept as it is in the original 400 year old document--so prior to our modern standardized spelling, except that superscripts (as the 'e' in 'ye' won't be superscripted here because they would be difficult to read).

The next post contains Folio 112 with some comments.

Promus - 7 - Folio 112

Parallels between Shake-Speare and Bacon's Promus

Parallels between Bacon's Promus and Romeo and Juliet - continued
(with special emphasis on Promus Folio 112) (A folio is a page in the Promus)

Part 2b

(Readers may want to print this out to more easily refer to it in later posts)
(To the right I'm citing the play the entry is paralleled with and leaving unparalleled entries intact here just for the sake of context)

Bacon's Promus of Formularies.
Folio 112

1189 good morow                                               (Romeo And Juliet)
1190 Good swear
1191 Good trauaile                                             (All's Well That Ends Well)
1192 good hast                                                   (Measure For Measure)
1193 good matens
1194 good betymes; bonum mane                       (1 Henry IV)
1195 bon iouyr. Bon iour; (bridgrome.)                  (Romeo And Juliet)
1196 good day to me & good morow to yow.         (Troilus And Cressida)
1197 i haue not sayd all my prayers till haue bid yow
        good morow.
1198 Late rysing fynding a bedde,                        (Romeo And Juliet)
1199 early risinge, summons to ryse                     (Romeo And Juliet)
1200 Diluculo surgere saluberrimum est                (Twelfth Night) 
1201 Surge puer mane sed noli surgere vane.
1202 Yow will not rise afore yor. betters                (Romeo And Juliet)
        (ye. sonne.
1203 Por mucho madrugar no amanece mas ayna.
1204 Qui a bon voisin a bon matin                         (Romeo And Juliet)
        (lodged next;
1205 Stulte quid est somnus gelidae nisi moris imago  (Romeo And Juliet)
1206 Longa quiescendi tempora fata dabunt.           (Romeo And Juliet)
1207 Albada; golden sleepe.                                  (Romeo And Juliet)
1208 early vp & neuer ye neere.
1209 The wings of ye. mornying.                             (Romeo And Juliet)
1210 The yowth & spring of ye. day                        (2 Henry IV)
1211 The Cock; The Larke                                      (Romeo And Juliet)
1212 Cowrt howres.                                                 (Romeo And Juliet)
1213 Constant; abedd when yow are bedd; & vp when
         yow are vp.
1214 Trew mens howres.
1215 Is this your first fligh x I doe not as byrds doe for
        I fly owt of my feathers Is it not a fayre one
1216 Sweet, fresh of ye. mornying.                       (Romeo And Juliet)
1217 I pray god your early rysing doe yow no hurt;  (Romeo And Juliet)
         Amen when I vse it.                        
1218 I cannot be ydle vp as yow canne.
1219 Yow could not sleep for your yll lodging; I cannot gett
1220 Yow have an alarum in your head               (Romeo And Juliet)
1221 Block heads & clock heads.                        (Romeo And Juliet)
1222 There is Law against lyers a bedde.           (Romeo And Juliet)
1223 Yow haue no warrant to ly a bedde.            (Romeo And Juliet)
1224 Synce yow are not gott vp turn vp.              (2 Henry IV)
1225 Hott cocckles withowt sands
1226     god night                                                  (Romeo And Juliet)
1227 Well to forgett;                                              (Romeo And Juliet)
1228 I wish yow may so well sleepe as yow may not fynd
        yor yll lodging.                                                (Romeo And Juliet)

Remember, these are 'seed' ideas and language parts and aren't expected to be found in the plays exactly as they are found in the Promus. None of the above entries were used in Bacon's prose works, and a few of them by their nature could only be used in plays or in Bacon's personal life. One doubts whether the bawdy puns (which will be explained later - unless they're too bawdy for this website) would have been used even in his personal life. They were better suited to the amusement of a theatre audience.

Some other Promus parallels with Roman And Juliet (besides those in Folio 112) will be included even though they may be slight or commonplace. But they are still relevant and interesting as little shreds of mental fibre which help to show that Bacon and Shake-Speare had the same brain texture.

Promus - 15 Romeo and Juliet

Part 2 - Parallels between Bacon's Promus and Romeo and Juliet
(with special emphasis on Promus Folio 112)

Part 2i

R&J  Act 2.3.11-18

(In the early morning Friar Lawrence makes his first entry. More may be said later on Friar Lawrence).

Friar L:  O, mickle is the powerful grace that lies
          In plants, herbs, stones, and their true qualities.
          For naught so vile that on the earth doth live
          But to the earth some special good doth give;
          Nor aught so good but, strain'd from that fair use,
          Revolts from true birth, stumbling on abuse.
          Virtue itself turns vice being misapplied,               [Line 17}
          And vice sometime's by action dignified.

now Promus entry 1337 (Folio 123):

"Quae continent, ut animalia ut plantae et amplius sed non amplius potest esse mali" ['Both animals and plants contain many ample properties, but they cannot be as amply endowed with bad properties"]

Promus entries 168 & 169 (Folio 86B), repeated in Promus 1459, (Folio 128):

"Aliquisque malo fuit usus in illo. Usque adeo latet utilitas: ["And there was some use in that evil. To such a degree does usefulness lie hidden"; from Ovid]

Comment: Shake-Speare's main source for the play, Harold Brooke's long poem on the same story, makes the first of the two points in Lines 17-18. But the second, converse, point is added by Shake-Speare as an extra piece of philosophizing on the lines of Promus 168 & 169. It means that evil sometimes has beneficial consequences. This point is also made in Henry V, 4.1.4-5:

"There is some soul of goodness in things evil
 Would men observingly distil it out;"

Promus - 31 Romeo and Juliet - born, woe

Part 2 - Parallels between Bacon's Promus and Romeo and Juliet
(with special emphasis on Promus Folio 112)

Part 2Y

R&J  Act 4.5.15

(The Nurse thinks Juliet to be dead):

"O welladay [alas] that ever I was born".


Bacon's Promus entry 1004 (Folio 104):

"Optimum non nasci" ["Better not to be born"; from Adagia 440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

R&J  Act 4.5.46-9

Lady Capulet:      one poor and loving child,
                      But one thing to rejoice and solace in,
                      And cruel death hath catch'd it from my sight.
Nurse:             O woe! O woeful, woeful, woeful day.

Bacon's Promus entry 1654  (Folio 132):

"Nulsoulas humaine sans helas" ["No human solace without woe - alas!"]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

R&J  Act  4.5.90

(Lord Capulet reflects that Juliet's proposed wedding is to become her funeral):

"And all things change them[selves] to the contrary".

Bacon's Promus entry 992  (Folio 103B):

"Omnium rerum Vicissitudo"  ["Vicissitude in all things"; from Adagia 250]

Promus - 33 Romeo and Juliet Conclusion

Conclusion on Folio 112 Parallels with Romeo And Juliet

(Note: this is going to be an abridged conclusion from Cockburn's. He goes into further detail to consider some few objections to common authorship and refutes them.)

As I said earlier, the parallels between Romeo And Juliet and the Promus, other than Folio 112, are mostly slight and/or commonplace, more or less. But I have noted 46 of them (in addition to 19 Folio 112 parallels) [note: I actually count 21 but we'll stay with his number of 19]; so they probably score by their cumulative weight. Would one find 65, or even 46, parallels between the Promus and any non-Shakespearian play?

The 19 Folio 112 parallels (out of 40 entries on that sheet) are a very different kettle of fish. The most telling of them are three entries written together at the foot of the Folio which parallel, and in the right order, the "goodnight" scene in Act 2.2; four entries which parallel the meeting with Friar Lawrence in Act 2.3, including the words "lodged next" which look suspiciously like a fragment of a line which Bacon was mulling over for that scene; the "bonjouir" or "bonjeur" pun; "the wings of the morning" which match "the wings of night"; and five entries, relating to block heads and clock heads, albada, and late rising, which parallel the end of Act 4.4 and the beginning of Act 4.5, two of them following those events in the right order.

What, then, is the explanation of these curious parallels with a single play based on a single Folio of the Promus? Mere coincidence? Mutual borrowing? One Stratfordian mentions only 6 of the Folio 112 parallels and calls them a coincidence. But all 19 (or 21) parallels together could not be. At least, the odds against it would be astronomical.

The only other Stratfordian that we know of to discuss it, E.A. Abbott, examined the Folio 112 entries from Mrs. Pott's book and concluded that there must have been either mutual borrowing or that they both borrowed from another source and couldn't be by accident. He thought that "Bacon in the year 1594 had either heard or read...Romeo And Juliet". But the play is usually thought to have been written in 1595, and was not published till 1597 and not in a good Quarto till 1599. The Promus was compiled probably in a period of little more than a year from December 1594 till about January 1596.

Further, the relevant entries on the Folio are mixed up with other entries which are not paralleled in the play. And they're mostly in a different form from their counterparts in the play. For instance, if Bacon had heard or read in the play "Care keeps his watch in every old man's eye, / And where care lodges, sleep shall never lie", he would hardly have written that down as "Qui a bon voisin a bon matin. Lodged next".

Finally, the entries on Folio 112 are so variegated and jumbled that one cannot imagine them being derived from one source.

The only tenable explanation of the Folio 112 parallels is surely common authorship. The evidence suggests that when Bacon was planning or already writing Romeo And Juliet, he read through Folio 112 to see if he could use any of its material. Indeed, it seems that mulling over the play in his head prompted some of the entries. We thus have, I believe, a fascinating glimpse of Shake-Speare in the throes of creation. Not rattling off lines with divine ease, but laboriously thinking up ideas and phrases, and ultimately fitting some of them together. That surely is how most poets work.