Another aside--
Thinking again a little about the unwillingness of the
Stratfordian side to participate in a mock trial, we have to remember that
there has been a pretty substantial informal debate already and very recently.
Now the interesting thing is that the current reason for them NOT wanting to
participate in a mock trial is because it would be beneath their dignity or
honor to do so. However, prior to this, there was 60 minutes with
Shakespeare and then Shakespeare Bites Back, and then Shakespeare
Beyond Doubt, all it seems in late 2011, in anticipation of the movie Anonymous
(released in late October 2011). At that time, their dignity and
honor REQUIRED them to defend their Authorship assertions. So what’s
changed? Well, maybe they think that they have fulfilled their goals
with these earlier efforts---even though the doubters responded to every point
asserted by the opposition, which should have led to continued scholarly-like
exchanges.
-----------------------------
Chapter 3 Shakespeare and Italy
continued
3A. Roe’s third chapter continues with The Two Gentleman
of Verona. The route from Milan to the outlaw’s wilderness. Roe
shows again how modern interpretations of this play contain an unwarranted
error and how the author knew this area quite well. He mentions how some
commentators have assumed that exiting from a ‘North gate’ to go east didn’t
make sense as well as the assumption of a forest being between Milan and Verona
or Mantua. From Roe’s research though, it was clear that the author knew that
to go East, one did leave out the North gate and went Northward a ways,
where there were actual outlaws, and that ‘Upon the rising of the mountain
foot’ one then took the road East. And that the area North of Milan was
best described as a ‘wilderness’. The forest was about 9 miles or ‘three
leagues’ travel (not in a straight course) in this Northern and Northeastern
direction. Somewhat through a part of it did one then turn east for Verona and
Mantua. This last scene being located in a ‘forest’ may be because the author
had previously described the outlaws as akin to those of Robin Hood fame that
the English audience could relate to. Though also there was some forested land
near Monza which is a short distance a way to the Northeast.
Sylvia, who didn’t want be caught leaving the city, had
Eglamour meet her at a ‘postern’ by the abbey wall. Though its existence
couldn’t be confirmed by Roe, it was logical to have been there once for the
practical coming and going of the abbey priests that managed the Lazzaretto.
Modern librarians told Roe that such a private gate would not be listed on any
public map of the time since it would only have been for the local friars’ use.
3B. After a long wait, Roe finally received an answer from
a specialist in Milan history regarding ‘St Gregory’s Well’. It had not
any relation to water, but was a large pit used as a mass grave for the many
thousands that had died of the plague in the 16th century. And this
further explained why Proteus cunningly sent his rival Thurio there, rather
than to an ordinary and innocuous water well.
A counter argument had been brought up by one mainstream
scholar saying that “Milan’s St Gregory’s Well was regularly mentioned by other
Elizabethan writers”. However, no such references have been provided and the
claim has no substance to it. Even if it had been mentioned such a reference
would also need to explain what kind of 'well' it actually had been. Alexander
Waugh mentioned that some earlier scholars were either “puzzled”, “surprised”,
or “astonished” that Shakespeare could have had any knowledge of it, even if it
had been a normal water well. But no one had an inkling of its true purpose,
and which makes perfect sense in the play, until Roe dug it up.
All of the above demonstrated Shakespeare’s keen
knowledge of the area and not things likely to be learned from casual
conversations with strangers, nor even necessary for the story, since
inaccurate imaginings would have served the ordinary untraveled in his audience
as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment